![]() However, when dragging and positioning to a certain time point, the picture will flicker irregularly, and the color and brightness will continue to beat. The video output by makemkv has no problem in normal playback, Dolby vision can be activated normally, and there are no problems in color, definition and other indicators. Would you care to elaborate on that? How can you tell EL data goes lost, other than because of decrease in total filesize? I mean, can't this decrease have to do with the fact that MakeMKV will merge two separate videotracks into one? It is worth noting that if the original BL layer main video and El + RPU enhancement layer extracted directly from uhd-bd use mkvtoolnix to synthesize dual tracks, and then use makemkv to compose single track and double-layer video BL + El + RPU, there will be no complete video file losing any data, which is perfect! Dolby vision can also be played normally in Sony 9500g Only in the intermediate process, RPU needs to be converted into profile 8 and then synthesized into EL layer for subsequent D ![]() After the combination of BL layer video after x265 recoding and EL layer of uhd-bd, there will still be the problem of losing EL layer data during makemka output. I have also tested the scheme you mentioned. Import that result into MakeMKV and create single track dual layer BL+EL+RPU mkv. With re-encoded BL, I tend to let tsMuxer mux it with EL+RPU and proper audio & sups into intermediate UHDBD iso. The EL is FEL ("Hereditary") (size about 6 GB)Īs for using a dual track dual layer mkv as intermediate:Įventhough MKVToolnix accepts importing BL and EL as separate videotracks, officially it does not support muxing "dual track/dual layer Dolby Vision". ![]() Sometimes I think file #2 is "better" but I'm not sure if this is only auto-suggestion. ![]() Was anyone trying the same? Can you see the difference between file #1 (Profile 8 re-encoded BL + RPU) and file #2 (Profile 4 re-encoded BL + original EL + RPU)? Honestly I can not see any visual difference. Why after "remuxing" in MakeMKV the file is getting 3 GB smaller coming from Profile 7 MKV into Profile 4 MKV? Why the Profile 4 from MakeMKV is about 25 GB and the Profile 7 from mkvtoolnix is about 28 GB. Is it a "proper" approach? I'm a bit surprised that re-encoded BL + original EL was remuxed so flawlessly. I played the file #2 (MakeMKV Profile 4) for 5 mins and it works like charm. Then I can also put this file into MakeMKV and create single track dual layer Re-encoded BL + original EL + original RPU Dolby Vision Profile 4. Plays in Shield 2019 Pro like a charm.Ģ.) "remux" it with mkvtoolnix with original EL+RPU (extracted from UHD Remux) into dual track dual layer Dolby Vision Profile 7. I can extract BL from UHD Remux then re-encode BL with x265.ġ.) "remux" it with dovi_tool inject-rpu (ver 8) into Dolby Vision Profile 8 with Re-encoded BL + original RPU.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |